ARCHAEOLOGY BOOKS
Hill figures
The Wilmington Giant: the Quest for a Lost Myth. Turnstone Press. 1983
1983 2012
The first
full-length book to be written about any individual British hill figure. (Tom
Lethbridge’s entertaining book Gogmagog
is really about a hoax, not a real hill figure.) I discuss in depth each of the
principal theories about the Wilmington Giant’s origins, drawing on the results
of modern research. This highly individual and (according to my publisher)
eloquent account of one of the great English landscape mysteries should appeal
to everyone who loves the landscape, history and folklore of the South Downs . Revised and updated in 2012.
Reviews:
‘. . . investigates all earlier
known theories. . . an heroic search. . . tremendous enthusiasm.’ Doris
Gundry, Chichester Observer.
‘A continuing sense of mystery
sustained - just like a whodunnit - until the closing pages.’ David
Shaw, Geographical Magazine.
‘Exciting conclusions. . . well
worth the read. ’
Sussex Life.
‘Well researched. . . the fullest
account.’ The Cauldron.
‘A modern antiquarian classic. . .
stylistic panache.’ 3rd
Stone.
‘An impressive study. . .
visionary.’ Paul
Newman.
‘A wonderful book.’ Sir Michael Tippett.
The Cerne Giant. Dorset Publishing
Company. 1996
My publisher
described this as ‘a lively and comprehensive account setting the Giant’s
biography firmly into its natural context, the history of Dorset.’ Many
theories have been put forward about the Giant - that he was a Roman Hercules;
a standard for Dorset rebels in the Civil War; a seventeenth century lampoon on
Lord Holles. I review and reject them one by one in favour of a grander, more
powerful and ancient interpretation that links the Giant with St Augustine’s
Well below. The findings are based in part on the results of my own geophysical
surveys. A finely detailed detective story that tracks the ancient Giant back
through the centuries to his origins.
Reviews:
‘A subject close
to [Castleden’s] own heart, and to an area in which he lives and of which he
has great knowledge. . . Rodney Castleden confounds sceptics with his reasoned
presentation of the evidence. His work has been aided and supported by many
senior figures in the archaeological field and he has the backing of
independent archaeologists
(through the CIA), who have expressed solidarity with his work and aims - he is
essentially a dedicated amateur in the best sense of the term. . . A splendid
and readable survey of the legends, lore and known facts about the Giant. Highly
recommended.’ Peter
Clayton, Minerva.
‘The author sets out sensible pointers to further
archaeological inquiry and marshals - with obvious affection for this splendid
old image - a body of material that must cause us to think again about
dismissing a pre-Roman origin’ Aficionados of hill figures and those who
delight in the picturesque aspects of English topography will want to own an
attractive, fully referenced and modestly priced addition to the literature.
Its author is no stranger to the field.’ Times Literary Supplement
‘A very readable book. . . thoroughly enjoyable.’
Dorset Year Book.
‘A brave and obsessive attempt to recover a lost
cosmogony, to draw in the threads of the past and enweave them in a narrative
as vivid and graphic as that of Bayeux. Because nothing is known for certain,
the task of producing a densely informative book on the Giant means that we are
presented a multitude of explanations that taper into improbability or huge
STOP signs. At times the immense figure attains a curious transparency as one
learns about Celtic farmsteads, Aelfric, Elizabethan intrigues, the Dissolution of the
monasteries, the Romans in Britain
and iconic images of warriors and gods. Beginning in the frivolous present,
when advertizers equip the Giant with a gigantic durex, a pair of
underpants and a Raleigh bicycle, the narrative probes deeper
and deeper into the bloodstained loams of Celtic lore until, in a dramatic coup
de theatre, the full horror is exposed. . . Here, then, is a chronicle in which
the reader absorbs a series of radiations; these cannot be fixed to a period narrower
than 500 BC - AD 1650, enabling the industrious author to rampage across vast
historical tracts like a friendly bull, kicking up scholarly mud, snorting
facts, diagrams, statistics. . . The section on Sir Walter Raleigh is
arresting, tracing the provenance of that heretical sect The School of Night
(an ideal subject for a Peter Ackroyd novel!). From details like these, the
charm and pulling power of the book emerges - a modern antiquarian classic; the
only other book on the subject to compare with it for compendious excellence
and stylistic panache is The Wilmington Giant by the same author.’ Paul Newman, 3rd Stone.
Ancient Hill Figures of Britain .
SB Publications. 2000
A detailed and
comprehensive guide to the oldest hill figures in Britain, briefly summarizing
all that I have learnt about this unique type of antiquity. I discuss the
evidence for the monuments’ antiquity, and explain why they were ignored in
medieval documents.
Review:
‘Admirably
written and intelligently informative. Rodney’s intimate knowledge of the area
scores as we enter Wilmington
churchyard and take sightings of the figure from the vantage of the 1600 year
old yew tree. After alluding to the many theories lightly, he gently spreads
out his neolithic case. No evangelising edge, just a contextual reasonableness,
pointing out the long barrows, flint mines and trade routes in the vicinity.
The Cerne Giant section keeps up the high standard . . . All the sections are
quirky and bright-eyed, for Rodney has diligently surveyed each place, taken
photographs and added his own pertinent insights to the current knowledge. Rodney
Castleden, to his credit, shows a keener nose than most for sniffing out truffles
from our dark past. An example of his patience, energy and resourcefulness is his
attempt to throw light on the lost giant of Shotover Hill, east of Oxford . He visits the
hill, beats around the ancient ochre pits, locates a spring and offers an
account of a Romano-British
head-making industry at a place known as Red Sharde Field - ‘Were these the
heads of deities - water sprites, perhaps? And was the site as a whole devoted
to manufacturing objects devoted to a religious cult of some kind?’ For topographers,
it is enchanting to learn facts like these. Of course, such a mode of privileging
may wield a terrible kinetic force. What exactly do we have here - a new ritual
complex?’ Paul Newman, 3rd Stone.
Britain in the neolithic
The Stonehenge people: an
Exploration of Life in Neolithic Britain, 4700-2000 BC. Routledge. 1987
Routledge
described this as ‘a vivid presentation of the world of the megaliths in a
style easily accessible to the non-specialist, written from detailed and
personal knowledge. This account gives a new insight into a brilliant phase of
achievement in Britain ’s
prehistory, as well as a coherent and convincing interpretation of Stonehenge ’s cultural context, history, purpose and
meaning.’ The Stonehenge People has become a prehistoric best-seller.
Reviews:
‘Readable and useful. . . Where a new or alternative
idea is presented it is clearly described. . . well balanced in style and
approach, taking the reader as far as the evidence is likely to allow and no
further.’ Graham Ritchie
(Nature).
‘Aubrey Burl and Rodney Castleden have both produced
fine studies. Both take liberties with their material, both in synthesizing
minimize the complexities of their subject. . . Their faults are far outweighed
by the richness of their material, the profundity of their analyses and the
ingenuity of their interpretations. Both succeed admirably in communicating
their ideas. On diagrams, illustrations and plans, Castleden wins hands down;
if he tells, he shows, often with his own reconstructions. . . To accompany
these gentlemen in their quest is a mind-expanding experience and a profound
exercise in humility.’ Edward Cowan (Scottish Tradition)
‘This richly illustrated book will
give the reader a profound insight into the mysteries and daily life of the
ancient inhabitants of Britain.’
New Humanity.
‘An ambitious attempt to bring the
Neolithic period to life.’
The London Archaeologist.
‘An interesting, informative and provocative book.’ Journal of Anthropological Research.
‘A well-written and full account of the British
neolithic. . . designed to hold the interest of undergraduates.’ Choice.
Readers’ comments:
‘A remarkably fresh and much-needed reappraisal of the
British Neolithic.’ Professor Colin Renfrew.
‘Anyone interested in the New Stone Age should start
with this book - it is one of the best.’
‘A wonderful book, a true gem. If you too have nursed a
lifelong fascination for the distant past and the fragmentary remains that have
survived into our lives, you will find this book a revelation, no, an avalanche
of revelations into the lives of our distant ancestors in the British Isles. Taking
the results of countless meticulous surveys of monuments and artefacts
throughout these isles, he has lyrically brushed off the dust and then carefully
pieced them together like some massive jigsaw into a picture of such detail and
clarity that I, for one, will never be able to look at some obscure, tattered
little stone circle in the same way again.’ Rod Drew.
Author’s comment:
‘The Stonehenge People’ is an ambitious book, perhaps
dangerously ambitious. One Scottish reviewer guessed that there must be many
archaeologists who would want to ‘ding me with their trowels’ and Julian
Richards did indeed write a petulant review dismissing the book as
‘irritating’. It addresses some big questions. Who built the neolithic
monuments and why? How were the
bluestones moved from the Preseli
Mountains to Salisbury
Plain? How were the big sarsen stones
moved from Avebury to Stonehenge ? Who were the
people who did these amazing things – and what did they think and believe? Above all, I wanted to bring the people
themselves and their dawning proto-civilization to life. It’s decades since
‘The Stonehenge People’ was first published. In that time, it has found many
friends, including some readers who have returned to it for enlightenment or
even comfort time and time again - among them the novelist Penelope Lively, who
described on Woman’s Hour how from time to time she returned to the book for
comfort, and the composer Michael Tippett. There seemed a happy inevitability
about the moment when Tippett agreed, between composing ‘The Mask of Time’ and
‘New Year’, to write the preface for the second (1992) edition. He felt that I had reunited him with his ancestors, the
people of the barrows.
Neolithic Britain :
New Stone Age Sites in England ,
Scotland and Wales .
Routledge. 1992
Archaeologists
increasingly regard the stone age as a period of great achievement. In this
book 1100 domestic, ceremonial and burial sites are listed, surveyed and
described; from them a sense of the diversity and vitality of the neolithic
communities emerges. This is the second book in my British neolithic trilogy.
It has recently been chosen by Routledge as Volume 8 in its Library Edition,
which it describes as ‘a rich selection of renowned and lesser-known
scholarship’. So it is one of 50 titles, rather out of place I think, among great
works by Stuart Piggott, Richard Atkinson, Richard Bradley, Leslie Grinsell,
Kathleen Kenyon and V. Gordon Childe.
Reviews:
‘Rodney Castleden has done us all a
favour, students particularly. . . reliable and nicely detailed accounts of
over a thousand sites. ‘ Minerva.
The Making of Stonehenge . Routledge. 1993
From the very
beginning Stonehenge held many meanings for the people who built it. It
acquired new layers of symbolism with time, and architectural cross references
were deliberately built into it to strengthen its power. Key symbolic
references were carefully reproduced or recalled in successive development
phases, proving cultural continuity over surprisingly long periods. In this
book I try to recover an ancient tribal achievement - and its meaning. This is
the third book in my British neolithic trilogy. In Geoffrey O’Brien’s The Reader’s Catalog it is listed as one
of the 40,000 best books in print; The
Stonehenge People is another. There is a talking book version, read by
Gordon Gould, created for the US Library of Congress National Library Service
for the Blind (3 cassettes, ref no RC-50708), though I have not, as the Library
of Congress’s newsletter claimed, been ‘blind since birth’! You can’t believe
everything you read.
Reviews:
‘Rodney Castleden has read all the reports and
summarizes what the experts have said in layman’s language, with numerous
diagrams of his own devising. As an aficionado, not constrained by the ambiguity
of evidence that hampers the professional archaeologist, he then advances into
speculative territory, proposing a design based on a half-ruined timber
roundhouse immortalized in stone. The Times.
‘Stonehenge
always seems to bring out the worst in archaeologists who either write books
that are too technical or too philosophical but in “The Making of Stonehenge”
Rodney Castleden comes close to providing a straightforward account of
Stonehenge. He is particularly good on Durrington Walls which is the huge henge
monument only a mile away from Stonehenge which surely provides the key to any interpretation. He is at his best
when synthesizing good academic work.’ Current Archaeology.
Readers’ comments:
‘A good read and a thorough description of the
archaeology of Stonehenge and its environs. The perspective also covers much
more about the people who made Stonehenge and
what we can infer about them, which adds colour to the archaeology. Readable
but still authentic - a good combination for those who want more than the Stonehenge guidebook.’
‘Castleden’s Stonehenge is something of a wonder in
itself! . . . Readable and convincing. To read this book is to gain a real
under-standing of this wonder of the world. Castleden’s work deserves better
acknowledgement than it has gotten.’
Britain 3000 BC.
Sutton. 2003
A moment of great
significance in the British Isles. Avebury, Stonehenge and many other major
monuments were at vital stages in their construction and use at this time,
while writing – often regarded as the hallmark of civilization – made its first
appearance in Europe . I use the evidence of
archaeological investigations to re-create the society, customs, economy,
religion and ritual of Britain 5000 years ago and to reveal the lost world of
prehistoric people.
Review:
In 3000 BC, Rodney Castleden transports us
back to the height of the Neolithic, a time of enormous and profound change and
‘great creative surges’. Combining archaeological evidence with informed – and
ideas, this book will have a wide appeal for readers of all ages. Oxbow
Books.
I strongly recommend this book to anyone who is beginning to
look at the Neolithic period in England ,
or to anyone who is intrigued by Stonehenge ,
Avebury, or the marvellous Orkney sites. Castleden does a fine job of
pulling together the current evidence and weaving it into a comprehensive
picture of life in the UK
in 3000 BC. Much of this involves interpretation, guesses, and
imaginative reconstruction, but the author usually makes it clear when he is
doing this, and carefully distinguishes between what the archaeological
evidence can prove or not prove, and when analogies from anthropology are
appropriate. Occasionally the text drifts into fashionable patter about
the psychology of spaces and the relation of mind to landscape, but not enough
to be annoying. But this is only one blemish in an otherwise excellent
and useful work. The book abounds in well-chosen maps, illustrations and
photographs, the material is presented in an orderly fashion, and the prose
style is pleasant. Phil Paine.
The Aegean in the bronze age
The Knossos Labyrinth: a New View of
the 'Palace of Minos' at Knossos. Routledge. 1989
Sir Arthur Evans
did most of the excavation at Knossos in central Crete. Evans was convinced
from first to last that Knossos ,
which remains central to our perception of Minoan civilization, was a royal
palace. I argue in this book that Evans’s evidence from the first half of the
twentieth century, as well as all subsequent research, proves that it was not a
palace at all but a great bronze age temple-complex, the scene of fantastic
ceremonies that included the famous bull leaping ritual. This book sent a cat
among the Minoan pigeons, but several leading professional archaeologists are
coming round to the same way of thinking.
Reviews:
‘A new and convincing perspective, this fascinating
book will also serve as a useful guide, giving descriptions and explanations
for many of the surviving structures which will greatly assist visitors.’ The Greek Gazette.
‘Castleden has read widely and is generally cautious
about his use of sources. The book is a stimulating one, a tale that is well
told. This reviewer moreover believes that ’palace’ was a misnomer and that
‘temple’ comes closer to the evidence recovered so far.’ Joseph
W. Shaw, Classical Views.
‘His book will
serve as excellent background, as well as a very manage-able guide for anyone
about to visit the site.’ Sunday
Telegraph.
‘A
model for the sort of book archaeologists should write.’
Cambridge Archaeological Review.
Minoans: Life in Bronze Age Crete . Routledge. 1990
A full-length
portrait of the Minoan civilization, discovered by Arthur Evans in 1900 and now
reinterpreted in the light of modern research. Mainly for the non-specialist
reader, ‘Minoans’ is fully illustrated with photos and many reconstruction
drawings. It has become, for many students and general readers, a favourite
introduction to a great, but often neglected, civilization. It amplifies and
complements the revolutionary ideas developed in the first book in the series,
‘The Knossos Labyrinth’.
Reviews:
‘Castleden has in recent years devoted himself with
verve and insight to the study of Minoan civilization, producing The Knossos
Labyrinth in 1989 and now this wide-ranging survey. The book is to be commended
as a well-researched and well-argued study of a fascinating but enigmatic
people.’ Professor J. V. Luce, Hermathena.
‘Castleden advances a theory of his
own, namely that Knossos was a temple. His case is convincing.’
Architectural Science Review.
Reader’s comment:
‘Excellent,
even-handed, purposefully unromanticized, and still the definitive book on the
Minoans.’
Sir
Arthur Evans was convinced that Knossos, which is central to our perception of
Minoan civilization, was a palace. This book presents in simple outline my view
that Evans’s evidence together with later archaeological evidence proves that
it was a great bronze age temple-complex, the scene of fantastic ceremonies and
the famous bull leaping ritual. A
pocket guide to Knossos
with colour photos.
Atlantis
Destroyed. Routledge. 1998
This book can
easily be read on its own, without reading Knossos
Labyrinth or Minoans first. It
re-examines two theories for the Aegean location of Atlantis put forward in the
early twentieth century: Minoan Crete and Minoan Thera. Spectacular recent
research findings on Knossos
and Thera show many parallels between Plato’s narrative and the Minoan
civilization. The book gives special
prominence to the sequences of wall paintings found on Santorini and the way
they illustrate elaborate initiation rites and public festivals, throwing
further light on the wonderful, complex and highly original bronze age civilization that we call Minoan. The
Department of Geological Sciences at California
State University ,
Los Angeles ,
lists Atlantis Destroyed as one of 70
‘Great Books’.
Readers’ Comments:
‘His meticulous research fascinates and intrigues you
like a chess game or detective story. . . Castleden avoids dogmatism. With
proper scientific detachment he lists in detail seven reasons why there have
been so many misunderstandings about Atlantis. . . A fascinating, for all its
meticulous detail never plodding, scientific dissection of Aegean
proto-history. I see it as the nodal point, the foundation on which future
archaeology and serious research can build.’ Laurence
Nowry.
‘Having studied the literature of Atlantis since 1974,
I know that it’s a very attractive and appealing myth. However, I entreat
anyone with an open mind who is lured by fascination with this mystery to
consider how so much that has been written about Atlantis can be identified as
pseudo-science and pseudo-history. For open-minded readers who can tolerate
alternatives to Michael Tsarion, I recommend reading Rodney Castleden’s “Atlantis
Destroyed”.’
‘The only serious work I’ve seen relating archaeology
to Plato’s myths is Castleden’s “Atlantis Destroyed”. . . of all the books I’ve
read on Atlantis, the most impressive and the one with the most archaeological
evidence. Castleden also wrote “The Making of Stonehenge”, “Neolithic Britain ”, “The Knossos
Labyrinth”, “The Stonehenge People” and “Minoans: Life in Bronze Age Crete ”. He illuminates several puzzles that have misled
many people. . . He provides a wealth of archaeological evidence and the book
is generously sprinkled with sketches and photographs. He even goes into
detailed points such as the fact that Santorini (destroyed by a massive
volcanic eruption) has red, white and black rocks matching the building
materials used in Atlantis. “Atlantis Destroyed” is a must read for anyone
interested in the possible historical background to the Atlantis story.’ Doug Weller.
Reviews:
‘Every generation gets the Atlantis it deserves. It is
appropriate that prehistorian Rodney Castleden should tackle the problem of the
lost continent with a four-square, down to earth efficiency, reflective of the
times. . . a convincing argument.’ The
Ley Hunter.
‘Combining dual skills as geographer and archaeologist,
Rodney Castleden provides a thorough,
gripping portrait of the Atlantis legend; of Minoan Crete; of the growth of a
mercantile empire and its threat to the mainland communities; of the mixture of
legend, fact and propaganda that goes into the making of a myth; of excavation,
interpretation and scholarly duelling; of the geophysical conditions that
climaxed in a magmatic outburst of alarming proportions. . . Not only does he
tell you the full history of Atlantis, you are also treated to an attractively
detailed exposition of Cretan culture. Furthermore, he proves an able skater in
the philosophical arena, setting Plato in his historical frame, spelling out
his ethical and political concerns - it is easy to forget that the ‘timeless’
philosopher had biases and private agendas. All in all, an entrancing, sombrely
powerful narrative of a sophisticated ‘lost’ empire that grew strong, flaunted
its leaves in the sun, overreached itself and ended with a bang rather than a whimper.’ Paul
Newman, 3rd Stone.
‘What, no swords ‘n’ sorcery? Can
this really be a book about Atlantis? Those close to the shores of sanity will
find this a sober argument for the real source of Plato’s yarn, one of the
powerful legends of all time.’ Daily Telegraph.
‘Before I read Castleden, I could not make sense of
Plato’s story about Atlantis. . . Rodney Castleden’s book is a first-class
opportunity to clarify the difference between history and archaeology on the
one hand and peculiar imaginings such as
those of Cayce on the other. Reading Atlantis Destroyed, I found myself asking: Why exactly is it that I
find Castleden's argument credible and interesting, when everything else I have
read about Atlantis, from Plato to the Antarctic, has seemed so patently
lacking in credibility? There are several possible answers to this question,
but I think that the heart of the matter has to do with the fact that Castleden
marshals his evidence and lays out his inferences with a view to showing
precisely where he could be mistaken, whereas the general run of claims about
Atlantis make huge demands on our credence and fail to deliver any hard
evidence at all. . . Castleden’s reconstruction of the life and fate of archaic Thera is
haunting and has entirely altered my sense of Plato’s far vaguer evocation of
the life and fate of Atlantis. . . After reading Castleden, one is led to the
peculiar sense that Karl Popper’s ‘open society’ may very well have been
ideally instantiated primordially in just that lost civilization which Plato
looked back to with admiration. Isn’t that ironical? Isn’t that fascinating?
Isn’t truth so much more interesting than fiction?’
Paul Monk, Quadrant.
‘Every generation gets the Atlantis it deserves. And in
today’s atmosphere of the New Rationalism, it is appropriate that prehistorian
Rodney Castleden should tackle the problem of the lost continent with a
four-square, down to earth efficiency, reflective of the times.’
Society of Ley Hunters.
Mycenaeans. Routledge.
2005
The Mycenaean
world was the world of the heroes who conquered Troy. Those heroes stood at the
heart of Greek self-perception for centuries after the fall of their
civilization. Since the rediscovery of the civilization of Mycenae by Heinrich Schliemann in the 1870s, knowledge
of these Greeks of the bronze age has increased steadily. Stepping into the
place of the collapsed civilization of Minoan Crete and the Peloponnese (the
subject of my earlier bestselling study, Minoans),
the Mycenaeans dominated mainland Greece and the Greek islands from about 1600
to 1200 BC. Their exploits became the subject of the legends that were
immortalized by Homer.
I lay out the fundamental traits of
Mycenaean civilization, its hierarchy, economy, religion and arts. The book
transforms our perspective of Minoan religion with my reinterpretation of the
familiar ‘palaces’ of Mycenae, Tiryns, Pylos and elsewhere – as temples. Their
sea-empire and their relations with other peoples of the bronze age world,
including the Hittites, the Egyptians and the Trojans, receive full attention.
An indispensable starting-point for the
study of the Greek bronze age.
Review:
‘Well-written, illustrated throughout and
authoritative, this is a great introduction to the Mycenaean civilization.
Castleden covers a wide range of topics from the Mycenaean people (their
physical appearance, clothing, jewellery, language) to their towns, cities and
palaces, their religious beliefs, sea-empire, their relations with other
polities within and beyond Greece, rural life and countryside, Homer and the
Trojan War and the eventual collapse of their civilization at the end of the 13th
century BC. Highly recommended.’ Oxbow
Books.
Reader’s comments:
‘Castleden has done a very good job synthesizing the
archaeological evidence. The book is well written with easy to follow text and
discourse and id filled with illustrations and annotations of artefacts, maps,
floorplans of extant buildings and pen and ink representations of wall
paintings and artefacts. Since Castleden is well versed in Minoan studies he is
quick to point up how much the Mycenaeans had appropriated from the island
culture: their art, their dress, and eventually their trade routes and
craftsmen. He also points up the Mycenaean accomplishments, expanding out of
the Peloponnese where most other books focus, and into the northern
territories dominated by Orchomenos and Thebes .
These people
were bureaucratic, they were unafraid to change the landscape to suit their
needs, diverting rivers and draining lakes, and they were militaristic. The
author addresses the various other interpretations put forth and comes forwards
with his own take on the material, presenting a well-reasoned and supporting
argument for his interpretation.
The biggest
issue brought forth by him is the reinterpretation of the [buildings in the]
citadels which were argued to be the palaces of the kings to actually be the
temple centres of the kingdom, akin to the Acropolis in classical Athens. All
in all, I found this volume very enjoyable and informative.’ Charles D. Gilliland.
‘. . . brings their culture and
society to life with wit and elegance. . . a major new contribution to our
understanding of this crucial period.’
The Attack on Troy . Pen & Sword.
2006
The fifth book in
my Aegean sequence. 3250 years ago Agamemnon, king of Mycenae
in Greece , attacked the city
of Troy in western Anatolia .
The bloody siege that followed gave rise to one of the most famous legends of
the ancient world, and the search for the truth behind the legend has intrigued
scholars ever since. In this new investigation I reconsider all the evidence –
from Homer’s poetry to discoveries made by modern archaeology – in order to
establish the facts and give a historical basis to the most potent myth of
ancient warfare. The new analysis provides a convincing reconstruction of the
Mycenaean raid and the brutal siege that Homer transformed into an epic and a
myth. 4-star rating onAmazon.
Author’s comment:
This is probably
the final book in the Aegean sequence, though I can’t be sure about that. When
I wrote the first, about Knossos, I had no idea that a narrative revolving
round a single idea, even if a very important idea, would or even could develop
across three or four books, and this climactic volume came out of the blue
after a discussion with editor Rupert Harding following his move from Sutton to
Pen & Sword. Rupert wanted to extend Pen & Sword’s military history list
back into antiquity. Did I have any ideas? My instant response was ‘Well, what
about the Trojan War?’ Equally instantly, I became very enthusiastic about the
project, positively wanting to write the book. Sometimes I know instantly that
I want to do something – like the time when John Urmson phoned, again out of
the blue, to ask if I wanted to write a music drama about Winfrith.
From the outset, I knew that I had to test
Homer’s account of events within the bronze age landscape of Troy . Here my background as a geomorphologist
came in very useful, enabling me to reconstruct, pretty reliably, the bronze
age landscape. Excitingly, once I had the city and its setting reconstructed in
detail, more and more of Homer’s description of the unfolding war fell into
place. That, more than anything else, convinced me that there is a large core
of historical truth in Homer. It is, for me, a very satisfying conclusion to
what has turned out to be an unexpectedly ambitious five-volume project.
Reader’s comments:
‘A quick run through gives the following impression.
Compilation of recent research plus a good helping of speculation. Very
worthwhile read for Trojan War fans. . . The corner has been turned on the
historicity of the Trojan War. The historical case is probably made. Enjoy!’
‘A solid reconstruction of the events behind the epic
poems of Homer. RC accepts the historical reality of the (or at least ‘a’)
Trojan War as do many modern archaeologists and historians of the ancient world
and in this book he presents plausible evidence for doing so, Castleden like
many others places the war about 1250 BCE, at the end of the VIth phase of the
city, but he does not neglect discussion of alternatives favored by others.’ Bruce
Trinque.
King Arthur
King Arthur: the Truth behind the
Legend. Routledge. 1999
Archaeological
and documentary evidence recreating Dark Age history and society shows not only
that King Arthur did exist, but that many of the romantic tales that surround
him - tales of Merlin, Camelot and Excalibur - are rooted in truth. It is
possible to re-create rather more of the geopolitics of the sixth century than
most people realise. At the centre of all that we know is an Arthur-shaped gap;
he is not in the documents, but we can infer his existence. I suggest a
solution to the puzzle of Arthur’s mysterious disappearance after the last
battle.
Reviews:
‘Both scholarly and accessible. . . a joy for all
Arthurian devotees as Castleden weaves his theories around the evidence. A
credible ‘This Is Your Life’ snapshot of Arthur the King without divesting the
legendary figure of his aura and majesty. The arguments he presents give us a
revolutionary insight into the vexed question of Arthur’s demise and final
resting place. This is one book that should not be missed by any Arthurian fan.’ Kenneth
Turner, Otago Daily Times.
‘Rodney Castleden is well known as an
investigator into prehistoric enigmas . . as expected, this then is a
thoroughly researched book, burrowing into scholarly literature, archaeological
reports, fringe theories and texts both ancient and modern . . . A bold attempt
to locate and give substance to the best known of the insular Dark Age figures,
and I for one will need little excuse to dip back into these pages.’ Chris
Lovegrove, Pendragon.
‘Stylish both in
terms of appearance and the approach to the text, Castleden, as historical
writer and researcher of proven quality, keeps his head even when uncovering
intriguing new evidence.’ Mobipocket.
Reader’s comment:
‘By carefully scrutinizing archaeological and documentary
evidence Castleden slowly builds a
picture of Arthur, his frontiers and political power-centres and his probable
life style, while the reader can begin to understand what life in sixth century
Britain may have been like. Arthurian studies have a fascination which can take
a strong hold on you. There is no
shortage of direct evidence of Arthur’s existence and each tiny piece lies within a different field
of scholarship: history, Celtic studies and philology. For every conclusion he
draws, Castleden gives the reader all the relevant evidence, his reasons for
dismissing some of it, and his reasons for accepting other parts. He manages to
make the book very easy to read, unlike many academic works. The arguments he
puts forward are compelling. The book gives an excellent insight into the
so-called ‘Dark Ages’. If like myself you have drawn an imaginary picture in
your head, then all you need is a little bit of geographical knowledge to make
sense of the rest of the book and give that picture a lot more detail.
Castleden has an enthusiasm which infects the reader and his argument are all credible. His Arthur is
radical yet believable and his ideas are incredibly interesting, particularly
with regard to the sites referred to in the legend. He has a brilliant theory
about Tintagel Castle . Castleden grips the subject by
the scruff of the neck and manages it with great ease and success. Read this
book and let your imagination do the rest!
‘Gorlagon’.
No comments:
Post a Comment